Abstract/References

Hydropic leiomyoma-like ovarian tumor: a case report

Tomoko Yamaguchi, Hyo Kyozuka, Yoshihiro Kochi, Fumihiro Ito, Hajime Odajima, Daisuke Suzuki, Yasuhisa Nomura

Author information
  • Tomoko Yamaguchi

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohta Nisinouchi Hospital

  • Hyo Kyozuka

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohta Nisinouchi Hospital

  • Yoshihiro Kochi

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohta Nisinouchi Hospital

  • Fumihiro Ito

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohta Nisinouchi Hospital

  • Hajime Odajima

    Department of Pathology, Ohta Nisinouchi Hospital

  • Daisuke Suzuki

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohta Nisinouchi Hospital

  • Yasuhisa Nomura

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohta Nisinouchi Hospital

Abstract

Uterine leiomyomas, benign tumors common in reproductive-aged women, can display rare variants such as hydropic leiomyoma (HL), which exhibit unique histological features like zonal edema and increased vascularity. However, due to its rarity, comprehensive clinical knowledge about HL is limited. We report a case of a 49-year-old Japanese woman who was premenopausal and nulliparous, presenting with a two-year history of abdominal distension. An MRI scan revealed a 20 cm mass in the posterior part of the uterus, exhibiting characteristics suggestive of an ovarian tumor. During laparotomy, a cystic tumor connected with a swollen fibroid was found, and pathology confirmed HL. This case emphasizes that hydropic leiomyomas can mimic malignant tumors on ultrasonography due to their atypical features, necessitating additional evaluations using alternative imaging techniques or histopathological examinations for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. The patient recovered uneventfully, broadening our understanding of HL’s clinical presentation.

The cintent of reseach paper

References

1. Murata T, Kyozuka H, Endo Y, et al. Preterm deliveries in women with uterine myomas:The Japan environment and children’s study. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18:2246, 2021.


2. D’Silva EC, Muda AM, Safiee AI, Ghazali WAHW. Five-Year Lapsed:Review of Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Open Myomectomy in Putrajaya Hospital. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 7:161-166, 2018.


3. Ghosh S, Naftalin J, Imrie R, Hoo WL. Natural History of Uterine Fibroids:A Radiological Perspective. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep, 7:117-121, 2018.


4. Giannubilo SR, Ciavattini A, Petraglia F, Castellucci M, Ciarmela P. Management of fibroids in perimenopausal women. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 27:416-421, 2015.


5. Griffin BB, Ban Y, Lu X, Wei JJ. Hydropic leiomyoma: a distinct variant of leiomyoma closely related to HMGA2 overexpression. Human Pathology, 84:164-172, 2019.


6. Babacan A, Kizilaslan C, Gun I, Muhcu M, Mungen E, Atay V. CA 125 and other tumor markers in uterine leiomyomas and their association with lesion characteristics. Int J Clin Exp Med, 7:1078-1083, 2014.


7. Sarkodie BD, Botwe BO, Ofori EK. Uterine fibroid characteristics and sonographic pattern among Ghanaian females undergoing pelvic ultrasound scan:a study at 3-major centres. BMC Womens Health, 16:10, 2016.


8. Bura V, Pintican RM, David RE, et al. MRI findings in-between leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma:a Rad-Path correlation of degenerated leiomyomas and variants. Br J Radio, 94:20210283, 2021.


9. Horta M, Cunha TM, Oliveira R, Magro P. Hydropic leiomyoma of the uterus presenting as a giant abdominal mass. BMJ Case Rep, 2015:bcr2015211929, 2015.


10. Heffernan E, Köbel M, Spielmann A. Case report:Hydropic leiomyoma of the uterus presenting in pregnancy:imaging features. Br J Radiol, 82:e164-167, 2009.


11. Awad EE, El-agwany AS, Elhabashy AM, El-zarka A, Moneim ASA. A giant uterine myometrium cyst mimicking an ovarian cyst in pregnancy:An uncommon presentation of hydropic degeneration of uterine fibroid. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 46:529-534, 2015.


12. Moore L, Wilson S, Rosen B. Giant hydropic uterine leiomyoma in pregnancy:unusual sonographic and Doppler appearance. J Ultrasound Med, 13:416-418, 1994.


13. Amant F, Gabriel C, Timmerman D, Vergote I. Pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome caused by a hydropic degenerating uterine leiomyoma with elevated CA 125. Gynecol Oncol, 83:153-157, 2001.


14. Coad JE, Sulaiman RA, Das K, Staley N. Perinodular hydropic degeneration of a uterine leiomyoma:a diagnostic challenge. Hum Pathol, 28:249-251,1997.


15. Roth LM, Reed RJ. Dissecting leiomyomas of the uterus other than cotyledonoid dissecting leiomyomas:a report of eight cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 23:1032-1039, 1999.


16. Jashnani KD, Kini S, Dhamija G. Perinodular hydropic degeneration in leiomyoma: an alarming histology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol, 53:173-175, 2010.


17. Abdel Wahab C, Jannot AS, Bonaffini PA, et al. Diagnostic algorithm to differentiate benign atypical leiomyomas from malignant uterine sarcomas with diffusion-weighted MRI. Radiology, 297:361-371, 2020.


18. Rio G, Lima M, Gil R, Horta M, Cunha TM. T2 hyperintense myometrial tumors:can MRI features differentiate leiomyomas from leiomyosarcomas? Abdom Radiol (NY), 44:3388-3397, 2019.


19. Patil AR, Nandikoor S, Padilu R. Hydropic degeneration of leiomyoma in nongravid uterus:The “split fiber” sign on magnetic resonance imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 28:182-186, 2018.

Figures