Fukushima Journalof Medical Science

Fukushima Society of Medical Science

Contact usPrivacy Policy

Abstract/References

Current issue
Archive

Associations between clinical neck symptoms and various evaluations ofcervical intervertebral disc degeneration by magnetic resonance imaging

Haruka Otaki, Koji Otani, Takehiro Watanabe, Miho Sekiguchi, Shin-ichi Konno

Author information

  • Haruka Otaki

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine

  • Koji Otani

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine

  • Takehiro Watanabe

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine

  • Miho Sekiguchi

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine

  • Shin-ichi Konno

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used to evaluate intervertebral disc degeneration. Recently, various evaluations of cervical disc degeneration using MRI have been conducted, but there is no gold standard. The purpose of this study was to compare the reproducibilities of previously reported classifications for evaluating cervical disc degeneration by MRI and their associations with clinical symptoms.


Participants and methods: A total of 582 subjects underwent conventional MRI of the cervical spine. Disc degeneration was assessed in each intervertebral disc from C2/3 to C7/T1 using five different classifications: Matsumoto’s grading system, Miyazaki’s grading system, Nakashima’s grading system, Jacobs’ grading system, and Suzuki’s grading system. MR images of 30 participants were used, and Cohen’s kappa coefficient of agreement of each classification was calculated for intra-observer and inter-observer reliabilities. These five classifications of disc degeneration and changes of vertebral endplates were measured, and associations with clinical symptoms were assessed.


Results: Kappa (κ) values of intra-observer agreement were higher for Jacobs’ classification, whereas those of inter-observer agreement were higher for Nakashima’s and Jacobs’ classifications than for other classifications. The prevalences of neck pain and shoulder stiffness were 27.4% and 41.9%, respectively. There were no associations for any classifications of disc degeneration and Modic types with neck pain or shoulder stiffness. Only the presence of Schmorl’s nodes was associated with neck pain.


Conclusion: At present, there is no specific classification for cervical disc degeneration associated with clinical symptoms. Vertebral endplate changes might be associated with clinical symptoms. It may be necessary to create a new classification for better reproducibility of the evaluation of cervical disc degeneration.

The cintent of reseach paper

References

1. Jacobs LJ, Chen AF, Kang JD, Lee JY. Reliable magnetic resonance imaging based grading system for cervical intervertebral disc degeneration. Asian Spine J, 10(1):70-74, 2016.


2. Peng B, DePalma MJ. Cervical disc degeneration and neck pain. J Pain Res, 11:2853-2857, 2018.


3. Fujimoto K, Miyagi M, Ishikawa T, et al. Sensory and autonomic innervation of the cervical intervertebral disc in rats:The pathomechanics of chronic discogenic neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 37:1357-1362, 2012.


4. Miyazaki M, Hong SW, Yoon SH, Morichita Y, Wang JC. Reliability of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Grading System for Cervical Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. J Spinal Disord Tech, 21(4):288-292, 2008.


5. Suzuki A, Daubs MD, Hayashi T, et al. Patterns of Cervical Disc Degeneration:Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Over 1000 Symptomatic Subjects. Glob Spine J, 8(3):254-259, 2018.


6. Nouri A, Martin AR, Mikulis D, Fehlings MG. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of degenerative cervical myelopathy:a review of structural changes and measurement techniques. Neurosurg Focus, 40(6):E5, 2016.


7. Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Suda K, et al. Cervical disc protrusion correlates with the severity of cervical disc degeneration:A cross-sectional study of 1211 relatively healthy volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 40(13):E774-779, 2015.


8. Matsumoto M, Fujimura Y, Suzuki N, et al. MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 80(1):19-24, 1998.


9. Hirai T, Otani K, Sekiguchi M, et al. Epidemiological study of cervical cord compression and its clinical symptoms in community-dwelling residents. PLoS ONE, 16(8):e0256732, 2012.


10. Suzuki A, Daubs MD, Hayashi T, et al. Magnetic resonance classification system of cervical intervertebral disk degeneration. Clin Spine Surg, 30(5):E547-553, 2017.


11. Kawaguchi Y, Kanamoti M, Ishihara H, et al. The association of lumbar disc disease with vittamin D receptor gene polumorphism. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84(1):2022-2028, 2002.


12. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Cartter JR. Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radilogy, 168(1):177-186, 1988.


13. Moustarhfir M, Bresson B, Koch P, et al. MR imaging of Schmorl’s nodes:Imaging characteristics and epidemio-clinical relationships. Diagn Intterv Imaging, 97(4):411-417, 2016.


14. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1):159-174, 1977.


15. Yang X, Karis DSA, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA. Association between Modic changes, disc degeneration, and neck pain in the cervical spine:a systematic review of literature. Spine J, 20(5): 754-764, 2020.


16. Kerttula L, Kurunlahti M, Jauhiainen J, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation time measurements to evaluate disc degeneration. Acta radiologica, 42(6):585-591, 2001.


17. Marinelli NL, Haughton VM, Anderson PA. T2 relaxation times correlated with stage of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and patient age. Am J Neuroradiol, 31(7):1278-1282, 2010.


18. Niu G, Yang J, Wang R, et al. MR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes:Apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantitation. Am J Neuroradiol, 32(9):1617-1623, 2011.


19. Yu HJ, Bahri S, Gardner V, Muftuler LT. In vivo quantification of lumbar disc degeneration: assessment of ADC value using a degenerative scoring system based on Pfirrmann framework. Eur Spine J, 24(11):2442-2448, 2014.


20. Savadjiev P, Chong J, Dohan A, et al. Demystification of AI-driven medical image interpretation: past, present and future. European Radiology, 29(3):1616-1624, 2019.


21. Martín Noguerol T, Paulano-Godino F, Martín-Valdivia MT, Menias CO, Luna A. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol, 16(9):1239-1247, 2019.


22. Peng B, DePalma MJ. Cervical disc degeneration and neck pain. J Pain Res, 11:2853-2857, 2018.


23. Jensen RK, Jensen TS, Gron S, et al. Prevalence of MRI findings in the cervical spine in patients with persistent neck pain based on quantification of MRI reports. Chiropr Man Therap, 27:13, 2019.


24. Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population:Results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 33(4 Suppl):S39-51, 2008.


25. Kanna RM, Shanmuganathan R, Rajagopalan VR, et al. Prevalence, patterns, and genetic association analysis of Modic vertebral endplate changes. Asian Spine J, 11(4):594-600, 2017.


26. Tsuji T, Fujiwara H, Nishiwaki Y, et al. Modic changes in the cervical spine:prospective 20- year follow-up study in asymptomatic subjects. J Orthop Sci, 24(4):612-617, 2019.


27. Yang X, Donk R, Arts MP, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA. Are Modic vertebral end-plate signal change associated with degeneration clinical outcomes in the cervical spine? World Neurosurg, 129:e881-889, 2019.


28. Kyere KA, Than KD, Wang AC, et al. Schmorl’s nodes. Eur Spine J, 21(11):2115-2121, 2012.


29. Kong L, Tian W, Cao P, et al. Predictive factor associated with neck pain in patients with cervical disc degeneration. Medicine, 96(43):1-7, 2017.


30. Boden SD, McCowin PR, Davis DO, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg, 72(8):1178-1184, 1990.

Figures (8)