Abstract/References

Evaluation and treatment of constipation in pregnancy:Examination using the Japanese version of the constipation evaluation scale

Makiho Ishibashi, Fumie Hashimoto, Yoshihiro Kouchi, Karin Imaizumi, Fumihiro Ito, Shun Yasuda

Author information
  • Makiho Ishibashi

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwase General Hospital

  • Fumie Hashimoto

    Pharmaceutical Department, Iwase General Hospital

  • Yoshihiro Kouchi

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwase General Hospital

  • Karin Imaizumi

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwase General Hospital

  • Fumihiro Ito

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwase General Hospital

  • Shun Yasuda

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwase General Hospital

Abstract

Objectives: No study has examined the effects of new constipation treatment drugs released in recent years in pregnant women. This prospective cohort study aimed to examine and compare the perinatal prognosis, efficacy rate, and safety of drugs frequently used to treat constipation.


Methods: The study included 211 perinatally managed individuals who answered a self-administered questionnaire during the second trimester and after delivery. The Japanese version of the constipation evaluation scale (Constipation Assessment Scale [CAS] long-term [LT] version) was used for the subjective evaluation of defecation status.


Results: Participants aware of constipation had significantly higher CAS scores than those who were unaware. Some participants with a CAS score of 5 points (treatment range) had no subjective symptoms of constipation, whereas some participants with a CAS score of ≤ 5 points were aware of constipation. Regarding the time of onset, 60% of those who had constipation before pregnancy had a high rate of constipation during pregnancy and after delivery. No significant difference was noted in conventional magnesium oxide and polyethylene glycol, a relatively new daily treatment drug, in perinatal prognosis or side effects.


Conclusions: Polyethylene glycol preparations alleviate constipation without inducing diarrhea, making them an appropriate therapeutic option for pregnant women.

The cintent of reseach paper

References

1. Kirihara N, Kamitomo M, Tabira T, Hashimoto T, Taniguchi H, Maeda T. Effect of probiotics on perinatal outcome in patients at high risk of preterm birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 44: 241-247, 2003.


2. Watanabe C. Survey on constipation in pregnant women. Bull Yachiyo Hosp, 26: 49-54, 2006.


3. Fukai K, Sugita A, Tanaka M. A developmental study of the Japanese version of the constipation assessment scare. The Jpn J Nurs Res, 28: 201-208, 1995.


4. Takai I, Yoneda M. Actual conditions regarding constipation and coping strategies for pregnant women. Ishikawa J Nurs, 103-110, 2014.


5. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare [Internet]. Health Information Site for Prevention of Lifestyle-Related Diseases, Constipation and Diet | E-Health Net. [Cited 15/5/2021]. Available from: mhlw.go.jp.


6. Statistics Bureau. Ministry of internal affairs and communications [Internet]. National Health and Nutrition Survey, 10 Daily meal status by morning, noon, and evening | Statistical table/graph display | General counter for official statistics. [Cited 15/5/2021]. Available from: e-stat.go.jp.


7. Kobayashi H. Relationship between constipation symptoms and water intake during pregnancy-examination using the Japanese version of the constipation evaluation scale. J Matern Nurs, 86-88, 2005.


8. Derbyshire E, Davies J, Costarelli V, Dettmar P. Diet, physical inactivity and the prevalence of constipation throughout and after pregnancy. Matern Child, Nutr, 2: 127-134, 2006.


9. McShane RE, McLane AM. Constipation. Consensual and empirical validation. Nurs Clin North Am, 20: 801-808, 1985.


10. Pharmaceutical interview form Movicol compounded internal medicine Japanese standard product classification number 872359.

Figures