1. Bosshard G, Zellweger U, Bopp M, et al. Medical End-of-Life Practices in Switzerland: A Comparison of 2001 and 2013. JAMA Intern Med, 176:555-556, 2016.
2. Clarke G, Fistein E, Holland A, Barclay M, Theimann P, Barclay S. Preferences for care towards the end of life when decision-making capacity may be impaired:A large scale cross-sectional survey of public attitudes in Great Britain and the United States. PLoS One, 12:e0172104, 2017.
3. Mori M, Morita T. Advances in Hospice and Palliative Care in Japan:A Review Paper. Korean J Hosp Palliat Car, 19:283-291, 2016.
4. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA, 284:2476-2482, 2000.
5. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, McIntyre LM, Tulsky JA. In search of a good death:observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med, 132:825-832, 2000.
6. van Wijngaarden E, Goossensen A, Leget C. The social-political challenges behind the wish to die in older people who consider their lives to be completed and no longer worth living. J Eur Soc Policy, 28:419-429, 2018.
7. Pronovost P, Angus DC. Economics of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med, 29: 46-51, 2001.
8. Crawley L, Payne R, Bolden J, Payne T, Washington P, Williams S. Palliative and end-of-life care in the African American community. JAMA, 284: 2518-2521, 2000.
9. Borum ML, Lynn J, Zhong Z. The effects of patient race on outcomes in seriously ill patients in SUPPORT:an overview of economic impact, medical intervention, and end-of-life decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc, 48:194-198, 2000.
10. Demakakos P, Nazroo J, Breeze E, Marmot M. Socioeconomic status and health:the role of subjective social status. Soc Sci Med, 67:330-340, 2008.
11. Dreyer A, Forde R, Nortvedt P. Autonomy at the end of life:life-prolonging treatment in nursing homes—relatives’ role in the decision-making process. J Med Ethics, 35:672-677, 2009.
12. Halvorsen K, Førde R, Nortvedt P. Value choices and considerations when limiting intensive care treatment:a qualitative study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 53:10-17, 2009.
13. Arber S, Vandrevala T, Daly T, Hampson S. Understanding gender differences in older people’s attitudes towards life-prolonging medical technologies, J Aging Stud, 22:366-375, 2008
14. Carmel S. The will to live:gender differences among elderly persons. Soc Sci Med, 52:949-958, 2001.
15. Hidaka T, Endo S, Kasuga H, et al. Disparity in pre-emptive end-of-life conversation experience caused by subjective economic status among general Japanese older adults:a cross-sectional study with stratified random sampling, BMJ Open, 9:e031681, 2019.
16. Hidaka T, Endo S, Kasuga H, et al. Associations of combinations of housing tenure status and household structure with subjective happiness among community-dwelling older adults:A cross-sectional study with stratified random sampling. Geriatr Gerontol Int, 20:615-620, 2020.
17. Hasegawa A, Takahashi M, Nemoto M, et al. Lexical analysis suggests differences between subgroups in anxieties over radiation exposure in Fukushima. J Radiat Res, 59:83-90, 2018.
18. Higuchi K. Quantitative analysis of textual data: Differentiation and coordination of two approaches. Sociological Theory and Methods (in Japanese), 19:101-115, 2004.
19. Seale C, Addington-Hall J. Dying at the best time. Soc Sci Med, 40:589-595, 1995.
20. Bhandari TR, Kutty VR, Ravindran TK. Women’s Autonomy and Its Correlates in Western Nepal: A Demographic Study. PLoS One, 11(1):e01474732016.
21. Nilsson ME, Maciejewski PK, Zhang B, et al. Mental health, treatment preferences, advance care planning, location, and quality of death in advanced cancer patients with dependent children. Cancer, 115:399-409, 2009.
22. Barnato AE, Anthony DL, Skinner J, Gallagher PM, Fisher ES. Racial and ethnic differences in preferences for end-of-life treatment. J Gen Intern Med, 24:695-701, 2009.
23. Smith JP. Healthy bodies and thick wallets:the dual relation between health and economic status. J Econ Perspect, 13:144-166, 1999.