Abstract/References

Esophageal thermal injury in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Takashi Kaneshiro, Yasuchika Takeishi

Author information
  • Takashi Kaneshiro

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine/Arrhythmia and Cardiac Pacing, Fukushima Medical University

  • Yasuchika Takeishi

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine/Arrhythmia and Cardiac Pacing, Fukushima Medical University

Abstract

Pulmonary vein isolation is an established method for the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Esophageal thermal injuries, such as esophageal erosion, ulceration and periesophageal nerve injury leading to gastric hypomotility, are important complications associated with pulmonary vein isolation. In this review article, we describe the mechanisms, characteristics and the predictors of esophageal thermal injury associated with pulmonary vein isolation.

The cintent of reseach paper

References

1. Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med, 339:659-666, 1998.


2. Calkins H, Reynolds MR, Spector P, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2:349-361, 2009.


3. Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, et al.;ThermoCool AF Trial Investigators. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 303:333-340, 2010.


4. Pappone C, Oral H, Santinelli V, et al. Atrio-esophageal fistula as a complication of percutaneous transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 109:2724-2726, 2004.


5. Dagres N, Kottkamp H, Piorkowski C, et al. Rapid detection and successful treatment of esophageal perforation after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons from five cases. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 17:1213-1215, 2006.


6. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Europace, 14:528-606, 2012.


7. Kautzner J, Neuzil P, Lambert H, et al. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace, 17:1229-1235, 2015.


8. Chikata A, Kato T, Sakagami S, et al. Optimal force-time integral for pulmonary vein isolation according to anatomical wall thickness under the ablation line. J Am Heart Assoc, doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.003155, 2016.


9. Das M, Loveday JJ, Wynn GJ, et al. Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values. Europace, 19:775-783, 2017.


10. Hussein A, Das M, Chaturvedi V, et al. Prospective use of Ablation Index targets improves clinical outcomes following ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 28:1037-1047, 2017.


11. Castrejón-Castrejón S, Martínez Cossiani M, Ortega Molina M, et al. Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application:short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 57:57-65, 2020.


12. Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, et al. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm, 16:165-169, 2019.


13. Ciconte G, de Asmundis C, Sieira J, et al. Single 3-minute freeze for second-generation cryoballoon ablation:one-year follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm, 12:673-680, 2015.


14. Su W, Kowal R, Kowalski M, et al. Best practice guide for cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation: the complication experience of more than 3000 procedures. Heart Rhythm, 12:1658-166, 2015.


15. Martinek M, Meyer C, Hassanein S, et al. Identification of a high-risk population for esophageal injury during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: procedural and anatomical considerations. Heart Rhythm, 7:1224-1230, 2010.


16. Yamasaki H, Tada H, Sekiguchi Y, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of asymptomatic excessive transmural injury after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 8:826-832, 2010.


17. Good E, Oral H, Lemola K, et al. Movement of the esophagus during left atrial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 46:2107-2110, 2005.


18. Kaneshiro T, Matsumoto Y, Nodera M, et al. Anatomical predisposing factors of transmural thermal injury after pulmonary vein isolation. Europace, 20:1122-1128, 2018.


19. Matsumoto Y, Kaneshiro T, Hijioka N, et al. Predicting factors of transmural thermal injury after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 54:101-108, 2019.


20. Kaneshiro T, Matsumoto Y, Hijioka N, et al. Distinct forms of esophageal lesions after radiofrequency and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol, 4:1642-1643, 2018.


21. Kaneshiro T, Kamioka M, Hijioka N, et al. Characteristics of esophageal injury in ablation of atrial fibrillation using a high-power short-duration setting. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 13:e008602, 2020.

Figures (6)